Search found 24 matches

by harikrishna
07 Jan 2016
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankar's Part ?

And, regarding Ram greater than Krishna, 'Ram' is said for God(ShivBaba) here, NOT Ram of Tretayug . But, unfortunately Mr. Dixit has used the Murli points meant for God on himself, and hence it is clear that he is playing role of Hiranyakashyap, is it not? One who calls himself as God is called Hi...
by harikrishna
05 Jan 2016
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankar's Part ?

....interpretations are NOT in accordance with the Murli points You are WRONG again. All interpretations are in accordance with Murli points. But to understand PROPERLY, one needs a churning mind. Because Murli is the poetry of ShivBaba. In 1966 Murli, Baba spoke this Murli point - "Tum sab batay d...
by harikrishna
03 Jan 2016
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

Gaate bhi hain sabka sadgati data Ram, parantu bandar buddhi hone ke karan samjte nahi ki Ram kisko kaha jata hai. Kahate hai jidhar dekho Ram hi Ram ramate hain. abhi ramate to manushya hai na? (Mu 11.3.75 page 1 last) They sing the praise, "The bestower of Salvation for ALL is Ram", but since they...
by harikrishna
03 Jan 2016
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

Ridiculous and double standards! PBKs say role of Father is strictness. And, even accuse Lekhraj Kirpalani for not controlling Yagya. But, as per them, it is OK if Mr Dixit allows child to play and create disturbance. Even in lowkik, a Father will not allow his children to do mischievous things in ...
by harikrishna
03 Jan 2016
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

mbbhat wrote Another just plain mis interpretation . Baba says- R and S did not fail in that birth in Silver Age, (but they had failed in their effort during previous Kalpa). It is not misinterpretation. Baba clearly said that it should not be told that Ram chandra had failed.You are misinterpretin...
by harikrishna
03 Jan 2016
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

So, even when he had faith, he left Yagya! For what purpose? Even when they claim the ENTIRE Yagya was in their own hands, what made him to leave Yagya if he had full faith that God was entering in him? There was a clash between sevak Ram and DL in Yagya about purity.Because of that he left his bod...
by harikrishna
03 Jan 2016
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

1)On one hand, PBKs say- At present Soul of Lekhraj Kirpalani is more power than soul of Dixit, but at the same time, they say remembrance of Mr Dixit is highest than any soul even now, which are contradictory. How can then soul of Lekhraj Kirpalani enter in Dixit? DL is Krishna baccha.child can ri...
by harikrishna
03 Jan 2016
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

If remembrance of Mr Dixit is more than soul of DL, how can soul of DL control or misuse body of Dixit? Because the soul of Shankar is still in purusharthi stage, and also there is a karmic account between those two, so soul of DL is able to control his body. But once his purusharth is complete and...
by harikrishna
02 Jan 2016
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Some evident errors
Replies: 219
Views: 16673

Re: Some evident errors

SM 11-3-10(3):- Gyan se bhi jaante hain ki hum beggar to prince ban rahe hain. HUMAARI AIM OBJECT HI RADHE KRISHN BAN_NE KI HAI. LN NAHIN, RADHE KRISHN. Kyonki poorey 5000 varsh to inkey hi kahenge. LN ke toh phir bhi 20-25 varsh kum ho jaate hain . Isliye Krishn ki mahimaa jaasti hai. Yah kisko pa...
by harikrishna
24 Dec 2012
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

What is the proof? Numerous proofs told by shiv baba in muralis when He was doing His part in Brahma Baba. I already submit some Murli points which clearly state shiv enter into Shankar. No one hear knowledge like baba.With the knowledge came from baba we recognize the Father. Crescent moon was sho...
by harikrishna
24 Dec 2012
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

Dixit just reads and explains. No Bhai...thats not happen there. Brahmababa reads and shiv baba explains and Shankar is in deep meditation with beloved Father shiv. no gyaan comes out of mouth of dixit Much knowledge came from baba when He explain.Many new matters gets revealed.And so many matters ...
by harikrishna
23 Dec 2012
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

Else- if PBKs say- No one reaches as high as Shiv except dixit/Shankar. Hence he is mixed with Shiv. and, hence in Bhaktimarg shankr is mixed with Shiv (by good souls only or by all souls, because all will give certificate , is it not). There is no need to say- "mixing happens due to not understand...
by harikrishna
23 Dec 2012
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

the statement of PBKs saying- "in the end other weak souls fail to recognize".- what value this has? Last(number) the last does not mean the last time. The soul at what time it came is not important but the soul which come at last(number) could not able to understand the difference between both and...
by harikrishna
22 Dec 2012
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

Dear Bhai they feel both as same, then saying they do know does not make sense. They do know because of brahmins of purushottam sangam yug give them knowledge but they could not find any difference in practical form as Shankar attain baap saman stage.So mix up. mbbhat wrote when is Shankar not baap ...
by harikrishna
22 Dec 2012
Forum: Questioning, Discussing & Debating
Topic: Shankar's Part ?
Replies: 297
Views: 27807

Re: Shankars Part?

I think you have not understood the question. I understood your question very well.You again did not understood the answer.Please read once or twice the answer.Its my request Bhai. Because of body consciousness even though it was told by Brahmins(purushotham sangam yugi) that Shiv and Shankar are s...