Dear Shivsean Bhai
shivsena wrote:Ak and Baba Dixit openly teach that DL played the role of Ravan and hiranya-kashyap by giving wrong directions to BKs.....do you also believe the same.....if you too believe that DL played the role of Ravan and bk is Ravan community, then do you believe that the soul who played Ravan, became karmatit and is also narrating avaykt Vanis to inculcate virtues and is entering VD to interfere in advance clarifications.
I personally at this point, do not see Brahma Baba as Ravan, in the way you may be suggesting. I believe by performing certain actions against Shrimat, he placed himself in the category, of a soul who belongs to the Ravana Community, as defined in the Sakar Murlis. However, this does not make me see him in a negative light, as after his physical death, he joins ShivBaba, and Baba Dixit, to play the role of Shankar as depicted in Bhakti memorials. He continues to study, and this process comes to an end in 2018-night of Brahma) when he finally realises, he is not the God of the Gita.
With regard to his interfering in AK clarifications, this is definately a possibility, as he revealed back in 1966 onwards(Destruction in 1976), his grasp of the deeper or more subtle aspects of Gyan, is fairly weak. One of his greatest strengths imo, is his ability to inculcate virtues, and teach others about this process, as he does in the Avyakt Vanis. Brahma Baba's weakness is not that of wordly ambition, such as is the case with the body conscious gurus of the BK world(Ravan raj)... but simply, that he doesn't have the powerful intellect of Baba Dixit. However, who in reality does; so this is not an insult, it is simply a point of fact(imo)!