# Flaw No. 621)FIVE different BRAHMAS, but only two types of Brahmins?:-
692)PBK theory says- In Confluence Age itself, there are five Brahmas in total in the BK/PBK yagyas. Mr. Dixit, ex PBK Kamala Devi, BK sister Vedanti, B Baba and BK Mama.
[In BK theory, there is only one Brahma, B Baba, who later becomes/became subtle Brahma and only one type of Confluence Aged braahmins. That is, BK= PBK (In BK view, BK is short form of PBK) ].
693)Now, the point is- if there are five DIFFERENT Brahmas, (logically speaking) obviously, there should be five different types of braahmins too, is it not?. But, PBKs teach/believe there are only TWO types of braahmins - BKs, and the so-called PBKs.
694)So, we can see here, PBKs falling into their own pit again and again. PBKs throw stones to BKs, but fail to realize that they are sitting in the house made from FULL/JUST of GLASS, a theory made from almost 100% lies created by bodily Guru Virendra Dev Dixit.
695)I think- It may not be wrong to say- Mr. Dixit as DOUBLE/TRIPPLE Hiranyakashyap.
First reason is- His attempts are to hijack the seat of many others - Prajapita, Sri Krishna, Sri Narayana, Sri Ram, etc.
Second reason- Mr. Dixit also tried to hijack seat of God also. For example -
---Mr. Dixit claims he is RUDRA as well as Confluence Aged Ram (even when in Murlis, sometimes Ram is meant for incorporeal Ram, Mr. Dixit misinterprets it for himself in his teachings).
---Mr. Dixit claims in his teachings - he is main part of Shivling. Sometimes, PBKs claim Shivling is memorial of his corporeal body/organ itself.
---Mr. Dixit claims God rides Chariot whole day and hence claims as if God is trapped in corporeal body all the time.
---PBKs believe Mr. Dixit is Father of Brahma, hence indirectly claim- he is ShivBaba.
---PBKs believe title ShivBaba includes corporeal body of Mr. Dixit too.
---Mr. Dixit (spiritually) murdered God by saying - just remembering point form of God is of no use.
---Mr. Dixit says- he should be mentally worshipped always. in PBK theory of Yaad, remembering Iron Aged impure corporeal body of Mr. Dixit is compulsory.
Third reason- For all these, Mr. Dixit mis-interpreted purest Godly versions, GYAAN or SPIRITUAL Murlis. So- he tried to murder the highest scripture.
Also- most importantly- Till recent, PBKs used to call words of Mr. Dixit as "clarification of Murlis". Now, they call words of Mr. Dixit as "ShivBaba's Murli" itself.
So- they have hijacked the title/word Murli also.
Also- PBKs consider body of Mr. Dixit itself is Paramdham. So- he has hijacked even the highest world too.
Flaw No. 622)PBKs inadvertently claim- All the PBK Brahmas are secondary, dummy or almost useless:-
697)PBKs claim ex PBK Kamala Devi(the so-called "PBK human mother Gita") is the Adi/First Brahma.
PBKs also believe she gave(became instrument to) birth only to Mr. Dixit/Sevakram and child Krishna(Krishna bachchaa). So, in PBK view- the first Brahma is capable of creating only one or two braahmins.
[Sometimes PBKs believe child Radha created child Krishna (since PBKs later shifted to theory of false human Gita and true human Gita, mostly in 1998 when PBK Kamala Devi became ex PBK when she left PBK Yagya].
So- practically, PBKs believe she(PBK first Brahma) successfully became instrument to create only one - PBK Sevakram.
698)The others(BK sister Vedanti, BK Mama) whom all "PBKs give title Brahma" , PBK do not call any BK or PBK in "their" names/surnames. They do not even mention how many percentage of braahmins have got created from these two respective Brahmas and whether they are mouth born(mukh vamshavali) or kukhvamshavali.
699)Let us take case of Mr. Dixit's position of Brahma. He himself hesistates to take position of Brahma, and wishes to take title of only Prajapita. He also/usually bifurcates the title Prajapita Brahma into separate as Prajapita and Brahma.
Also- practically, Mr. Dixit believes he cannot create braahmins (as per his bifurcation theory). Hence PBKs believe they are children of both Mr. Dixit and B Baba (not of any other Brahmas!- so inadvertently PBKs admit their Brahmas are inferior to B Baba).
[On the other hand, BKs believe B baba can create braahmins just with help of God= God can create braahmins just through one human personality B Baba].
700)So- in PBK inadvertent view- B baba becomes most wanted among all these, is it not? In the two words used by Mr. Dixit - PBK and BK, alphabet B(Brahma) is present in both, but P(Prajapita) is present in one category only.
[So, unknowingly, PBKs admit their Prajapita became inferior than Brahma here, is it not?]
701)If PBKs practically believe - Mr. Dixit is also a Brahma, then PBKs should say either of the following-
---They do not need B baba for the creation, since Mr. Dixit is both P and B. OR
---Change/Make the title PBK as fully CLEAR. That is PBBK (Prajapita Brahma and Brahma kumars/kumaris= Children of both Mr. Dixit and B Baba), instead of just PBK is it not?
[here, alse we can say- in PBK view- no other Brahmas are included in the title BK or PBK].
702)PBK foolishness/ignorance is visble by default itself. All- whether BKs or PBKs know/believe- Creation of braahmins is impossible without Shiva.
But, in the name BRAAHMIN, BK or PBK, - there is no mention of word/alphabet of Shiv. Why PBKs forget Shiv here or do not address this?
[BK view is simple and clear- Brahma cannot exist with Shiva. Because Brahma is the Chariot of Shiv and can be one and only one. Hence in the title Brahma or Brahmin, Shiv is automatically present - for the gyaani tu atmas.
Hence most beloved Ocean of knowledge ShivBaba also says in Murlis - children, your full name is "shivavamshi Prajapita Brahma Kumar and Kumaris", and also give different names like "swadarshan chakradhaari braahman kulbhooshan", etc. ]. But, the short form is "Brahmins" or "BKs".
703)But, PBKs criticize BKs, by asking- where is the name P/Prajapita (physically) is your title BK? (They do not ask in the same way- where is name Shiva in your title BK)
But, by doing so, PBKs fall into their own pit, because by claiming there is need of physically alphabet P in the title BK (for the Gyani tu atmas), they inadvertently commit two blunders.
First, they have admitted that - their Prapaita is not a Brahma at all.
Second- they have forgotten Shiva. They inadvertently claim creation is possible without Shiva. So- act superior to ShivBaba. Because they are more interested in title Prajapita than Shiva. - the highest blunder.
[For BKs, this is not a great blunder, because for BKs, Chariot is only one B baba, without Shiv, Brahma has no value.]
But, in PBK view, there can be many Brahmas, and as already said above, and in PBK view- all the Brahmas are not very next to Shiv. In PBK view- some Brahmas are like- false Gita, cowardly purity, etc, etc.