arjun wrote:(on 13 may 2009) I don't know whether it is your ego or your ignorance which makes you keep repeating such statements. But it definitely is a demoralizing statement for those who are sincerely making efforts despite the vicious atmosphere of the world. ...
If you start telling every patient that you have no chance survival unless a miracle takes place in future, then even a patient who may have chances of recovery would die prematurely. This is what you are doing to all the spiritual effortmakers by your constant negative propaganda about the BK and PBK knowledge.
(on 14 may 2009) ...as a spiritual doctor (as Baba calls His children) you do just the opposite by hammering PBKs and BKs day and night that The Knowledge that they are following is completely false...
I am quoting you from the thread: Is Veerendra Dev Dixit not aware of Supreme Soul Shiv?
arjun wrote: (on 13 may 2009) No, it does not mean that just because some sentences are in direct speech, they have been spoken by ShivBaba in direct speech. They are definitely preceded somewhere by indirect speech, like 'the Father says' , 'Baba says' etc. So, on the whole the entire Murli is in an indirect speech.
So, sorry, I am not with you on this issue. :sad:
Shivsena wrote that he fully agrees with you in this issue. To this you replied,
arjun wrote: (on 13 may 2009) Thank God you agree with us at least on one point. :D
Dear Arjun, are you (and Shivsena) not questioning the basis of Rudra Gyaan Yagnya? i.e., the Murlis. Is it proper. If it is proper, then there is no wrong in questioning anything and anyone with regard to ShivBaba's knowledge.
You have said that it is disheartening what Shivsena does. But when I read your views about Murlis and views of Shivsena, it really pinched my heart a bit for a moment. But, I will not get disheartened, because I have already passed these stages. And I have to get to The Truth, what may come.
I have started a new thread on this issue in the commonroom. "Direct or Indirect or just nonsense (havamahal)."