sita wrote:Certainly. War is inevitable.
There is no much things, like actual war, required. AIVV will fall itself down, and 'crumble', like their own 'Jagadamba' had left them; and for each such 'crumbling', they will keep on inventing new excuses and convincing 'justifications', (making all the 'idiots' actually believe that they are 'unlimited clarifications'), to keep on sustaining themselves, till the end - as they have done in the case of their 'Jagadamba'!
They are ready to believe in ANYTHING, in order to 'survive', if not in this EXISTENCE, then in the NEXT EXISTENCE! Same principle is used to brain-wash all those who 'BLOW THEMSELVES UP', with the firm assurance and STAUNCH BELIEF that they are on their way to Paradise and God
! The 'shooting' of same is currently taking place in AIVV, with the PBKs!
And- PBKs had given the date of revelation as 2016, and by their own view, there should be 2.25 lakh rudrmala souls. Are both of these conditions going to happen in 2016? With what face can PBKs come up, other than BLIND BELIEF?
# Flaw No. 249) PBKs finally 'opening their mouth' FULLY:-
Krishna Jayanti is in the Confluence Age and not in the Golden Age.
Many times 'Sita' soul used to argue- "Who had said- birth of Krishna took place in 1936? He is Krishna of G Age, etc, etc." - trying to hide, when they failed to defend their claims logically, or as per proper Murli points of view.
But, now- the soul could not continue any longer with the 'masquerades', and said/accepted it openly what they actually believe. And- they now start of speaking about war. What else they can say after losing every point of view?
But- as already explained, PBKs fail here- as the Murli point clearly says- Radha and others too come in this. - Error No. 29 - viewtopic.php?f=39&t=2593&p=50566&hilit=bachchi#p50566
Three CLEAR points of failures of PBKs in the above Murli point are -
i)-Baba has named Radha AFTER
Krishna, which implies Radha took birth after Krishna. But, PBKs believe 'Radha' first took birth and then gave birth to Krishna. (according to them, sometimes they say- 'Radha' here refers to Conf Aged, while 'Krishna' refers to Golden Aged)! TOTAL CONFUSION & CHAOS!!!*
ii)--Ridiculous thing is- Baba says- GitaMata is the mother of Krishna, but PBKs believe Radha bachchi, (who is the TRUE Gita of Conf Age, according to them), is the real mother of Krishna (of Golden Age, according to them). Should Radha be yugal/couple of Krishna or mother of Krishna? - which logic is this? No Murli point or lowkik scripture will support this.
iii) - Also- the Murli point says- With Radha, all others
also come(are included). This Murli point clearly implies that- the study refers to Conf. Age, while the actual births refer to G Age. But, Mr. Dixit misinterpreted same, to apply fully for Conf Age, and PBKs cannot explain it properly, and are themselves TOTALLY CONFUSED. Who all
had been there along with Radha (of Conf Age) in 1936 incident?
Roy Soul once replied - "birth of Krishna refers to Conf. Age, and birth of Radha and all others refers to Golden Age",- in the attempt to somewhat fit the Murli point, but failing at every attempt.
SIMPLE JUGGLERY and TOM-FOOLERY, to DECEIVE ONLY THEMSELVES
Why should we say 2018?
I said in "PBK view"
. PBKs believe the practical date of birth of Conf. Aged Narayan is 2018 (initially, they had BELIEVED it to be 2008 - then got postponed).- :laugh:
Baba has said in the Murli about 1976.
Without understanding the real unlimited meaning, PBKs are using Baba as 'scapegoat', while NOT REAL-EYEsing that they are CONTINUING to PERSISTENTLY and CONSISTENTLY OPPOSE, MOCK, INSULT and DEFAME God, at EACH and EVERY step, by their MISINTERPRETATIONS, MISREPRESENTATIONS & MISAPPROPRIATIONS of EACH and EVERY PURE Version of God in the SMs and AVs - IN SPITE of CLEAR CLARIFICATIONS being CONSISTENTLY provided on this forum, as well!
Interested viewers may review the following post - viewtopic.php?f=40&t=2642&start=75#p51407
You call him fool and a liar.
I never said so. I had mentioned, to motivate children, Baba may have spoken so.* But, PBKs have made their own bodily Guru, as God; and CONFIRM & PROVE all of themselves to be - EVIDENT FOOLS & DOWNRIGHT LIARS! (Viewers may like to review the post mentioned in the link above).
* - Even though it may appear as a lie, it is not a lie, but a technique employed for the benefit of the children. Because baba says- "I speak as per drama. I speak what I had spoken 5000 years before. So, if the children are weak and have to be filtered- as per drama- egoless Baba will have no hesitation to speak so, because he completely surrenders HIMSELF to drama."
THE PBKs SIMPLY REFUSE TO LOOK AT, CONSIDER or ACCEPT any of those Murli Points, (in the CORRECT CONTEXT and PROPER PERSPECTIVE), which go ABSOLUTELY AGAINST their philosophy. At such times, their INTELLECT seems to FREEZE, and DOES NOT SEEM TO ACCEPT THE FACT that REAL ShivBaba or God Himself has spoken these Versions! They DO NOT seem to consider that they are inadvertently calling God a FOOL and a LIAR
, in such cases! This is the EXACT reason why God has declared that if one desires to see 'MAHA-MURKHs' or GREATEST SPIRITUAL IDIOTS, one should see here, in the Yagya - the VERY BEST and MOST CLASSICAL EXAMPLE being 'MAHA-MURKH' Virendra Dev Dixit
and the EQUALLY 'MAHA-MURKH', BLIND PBKs! (Viewers may like to review the post mentioned in the link above).
Certainly. If you plant a seed on stone (like intellect) it will not give fruit at all. One and the same seed of knowledge gives different fruit according to the different soil of the intellect.
So, by giving seat of Jagadmaba to Premkanta, it reflects the intelligence of Mr Dixit as well, is it not?
So, according to you, who planted the 'seed' on stone (like intellect) of Premkanta, and made her believe that she was the 'real Jagadamba? Was it God or REAL ShivBaba, or Ravan or FALSE 'ShivBaba', or your bodily guru, Virendra Dev Dixit
, or the imaginary 'ghost' who is riding Virendra Dev Dixit
, (according to him and the PBKs)???
Many times it was answered to you.
Just a lie. Never answered, as required- who all had witnessed the incident 1976 in AIVV and what was their experience? As- "in your own view"
- you had said- birth or revelation means "AT LEAST SOME SOULS SHOULD ACCEPT HIM AS Father
". Who are these souls???
PBKs describe the incidents of 1936 in many pages in their literature, BUT how many lines of text in their literature describe the incident of 1976?
DOES NOT THIS AGAIN PROVE THAT Mr. DIXIT HAS NO FOUNDATION AT ALL, AND IS STANDING (VIRTUALLY) ON DLR - from all viewpoints and dimensions?
You may please carry on your false propaganda, if it makes you FEEL happy, and helps you to achieve your soul-conscious stage - ACCORDING to your understanding, and as per Drama. I have to eventually surrender to Drama. Even those who are 'BLOWING' themselves up, ALMOST EVERYDAY, with the FIRM & STAUNCH belief that they are going to 'Paradise', are doing so, as per Drama, is it not?
So, CARRY ON CLEO