# Flaw No. 277) A significant conclusion in the discussion:-
sita wrote:All of these concepts have their meaning and explanation. There is some truth in it, ...
There is no truth in everything. Some have, some do not have. Already said about this. People believe moksha (permanent liberation) is possible. Does it have any truth?
People believe God takes incarnation even as an animal. Does it have any truth?***
Similarly, there is no surprise if devotees give human form to God or point of light**. They EVEN HAVE
the concept of sagunn
(corporeal) and nirgunn
When PBKs can make so many mistakes, and do not hesitate to say-
--Brahma = Krishna,
--Dixit = Chariot, a person who misinterprets Godly versions to project himself as the greatest human personality,
--impure human beings as Narayan, Krishna, etc,
there is NO SURPRISE
in Bhaktimarg people writing wrong things or getting confused.
So, there will be various types of yaadgaars due to various misconceived beliefs and understanding of varieties of people.
After all, God takes body, so he may be shown in human form as well. God is mixed with everything and everyone.
The only point of discussion remaining is
- in Bhakti, name of Shankar is shown as a FULLY ALTERNATIVE**
to Shiv. So, to what extent we understand the part of Shankar, is the one that remains.
--But, even part of Mama and other great souls, in Advance Party, are also yet to be known.
---We will know it in future.
But, Mr. Dixit took false advantage of this situation and started his FP (False Propaganda), and fooled others to his capacity in drama, and became instrument for the creation of other splinter groups too. Drama is variety. So, there would be varieties even here. So, his part too is significant. And- this is a test for others too, in recognizing God. Also- God's part would be still continuing in 'gupt' till the end, as people may think- "Oh- here(in BKs) also there are many types - (BKs, PBKs, etc)", this is also just like other organizations/cults, etc.
You or PBKs may give any so called extra- ordinary clarifications to Murli points. If you see lowkik scriptures, they too explain VERY NICELY.
Mr. Dixit is similar to one, but more dangerous
as his sole purpose is not to explain, but cheat people without making them even suspect that they are being cheated - but, on the contrary, even making them believe that they are receiving salvation from God, when, IN ACTUAL FACT, they are following the path of perdition and degradation! But still his followers are fortunate to some extent.
---Fortunate: Dixit is (mis)using the Murlis (highest teachings). So, the believers would be following dharna to a good level, just like the devotees in the outer world. He cannot make the followers great criminals. They are lucky, not because of Dixit, but because they believe in Murli.
---The unfortunate thing is- the followers would be losing the highest fortune for Kalpa after Kalpa, and they would be judged by Dharmaraj and would be accounted 100 fold/times.
But, again it is drama. Each one has freedom. So, there is nothing wrong in the role of PBKs. It is left to their choice how and what they need to choose. All the best.
* - It is PBK FP which they like to argue and give erroneous, twisted, double standard explanations and fit some points, by hook or crook, and even do not hesitate to give bluntly wrong judgments- totally against truth, right context and everything sensible, and then just say- memorial of point of light or God in Bhaktimarg cannot be a human form, while they justify all other such memorials by all sort of means.
Arey dear soul,
Baba says- lowkik people have even made the Brahm tatw- the INFINITE place of residence itself to be Ishwar, (so, it is not question of just point of light here).
--According to PBKs, Ishwar can mean either to "point of light" or to "their Shankar" or "Shiv in their Shankar", right?
So, how come people believing the infinite space to any of these three? Can INFINITE SPACE represent any of these three?
So, think and churn in broad-minded way
, by putting intellect of self in a non biased way too. Better do not follow or agree the interpretations of someone, which clearly go AGAINST OTHER HUNDREDS OF Murli POINTS, IS IT NOT?
** - So, as said above, it is not just Shankar mixed with Shiv.
Even Brahm/Brahma is mixed with Ishwar. They call Brahm Tatw as Ishwar. There can be few more things like this.
So, better do not just mug what you received from Mr. Dixit and simply repeating like a parrot - "(So called) Mr. Sevakram = Dixit = Krishna = Narayan = Ram = Shankar, etc, etc".
*** - Mr. Dixit created FP and gave erroneous interpretation for Shankar riding on Bull. A question was put to you/PBKs - When and how (PBK) Shankar rides Bull?
You did/could not even try
to explain this MOST IMPORTANT POINT.
Mr. Dixit replaced Shiv by himself and claims that in future he is going to control Bull (DLR). But, you can see it resulted only in his own spiritual suicide.
You or any PBK member here have been as if DUMB
(did not try to attempt to reply) for MANY such HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT QUERIES pertaining to their own theory/claims on which their very basics and foundation rely on.
The ability of PBKs showing path of truth is clearly visible here, is it not?