Sure thing. One day. Everything is destined to collapse.AIVV will fall itself down, and 'crumble',
What have I tried to hide. Nothing. I have always openly said what I believe. Krishna is about the Confluence Age. Name means the act. The role of attracting is in the Confluence Age. Krishna is a name for God and his part of playing the sweet melody of the flute of knowledge in the Confluence Age.Many times 'Sita' soul used to argue- "Who had said- birth of Krishna took place in 1936? He is Krishna of G Age, etc, etc." - trying to hide, when they failed to defend their claims logically, or as per proper Murli points of view.
But, now- the soul could not continue any longer with the 'masquerades', and said/accepted it openly what they actually believe. And- they now start of speaking about war. What else they can say after losing every point of view?
It is war of ideas. When the Sun of Knowledge shines darkness of ignorance is dispersed. Like they show in the scriptures that Vishnu or Krishna cuts heads with his chakra and they say that it is a blessing to die of Krishna's hands. It is about separating the soul from the body. He will take everyone even through beatings, he will not leave anyone. War is created by those who spread duality.
Please quote the Murli point.iii) - Also- the Murli point says- With Radha, all others also come(are included). This Murli point clearly implies that- the study refers to Conf. Age, while the actual births refer to G Age. But, Mr. Dixit misinterpreted same, to apply fully for Conf Age, and PBKs cannot explain it properly, and are themselves TOTALLY CONFUSED. Who all had been there along with Radha (of Conf Age) in 1936 incident?
What was the benefit? If it was about to inspire the children to make effort, what effort the children were supposed to make, what did they have to achieve, what aim, through this tactic, and did someone achieve it and who?Even though it may appear as a lie, it is not a lie, but a technique employed for the benefit of the children.
In 1976 few BKs who had got the advanced knowledge started spreading the word within the Brahmin family.who all had witnessed the incident 1976 in AIVV and what was their experience
Whomever I enter has to be named Brahma. Brahma is name of many.1)PBKs are yet to explain properly how it is Brahma so Vishnu in one second. PBKs give names- Ram, Shankar, Prajapita Brahma, Narayan, etc., to Mr Dixit almost throughout Conf. Age.
They even give both the names- Brahma and Krishna to Brahma Baba throughout the Conf. Age.
2)Now, to the point- The memorial in Bhakti is - "Brahma so Vishnu", not "Shankar so Vishnu" , "Krishna so Vishnu", or "Ram so Vishnu", etc.
3)As per PBK philosophy, ALL these names - Krishna, Ram, etc- apply to Conf. Aged human personalities.
4)In their view- (mostly) it is their Prajapita Brahma(Mr Dixit) who gets transformed into Vishnu in a second. Now, the questions arise are-
5)Why the memorial in Bhakti is NOT "Shankar so Vishnu"- which would be MOST APPROPRIATE to avoid confusion (as in PBK view- 'Brahma' are many) or at least "Ram so Vishnu"? or at least "Prajapita Brahma so Vishnu"???
6)The point is- the above memorial should have been either "ALL THE NAMES so Vishnu" or just one "(Prajapita Brahma or Shankar) so Vishnu", is it not? [because in PBK view- Prajapita and Shankar are just one- throughout the Kalpa).
This is not always the case. For example if a soul enters into some Brahmin, or some evil spirit enters the name is not changed. BapDada also plays part by entering children secretly.7)So- the argument is- when a human soul enters into another human being, the name of the body changes (Of course, it is true- if the soul that enters plays a specific role in that body).
PBKs believe God entered into Mr Dixit in 1976, then his name changed to Brahma or Prajapita Brahma. They then give him all other names too. OK, already said.
Another argument that the name is about the actions, about the role that the soul plays through the body is that the name of Krishna changes to Narayan. In this case we don't have change of body, nor soul entering, but we have change of acts.
Shankar means mixed part, 3 souls play part in it. Another name indicating that entrance is Ardhanareshvar.8)PBKs believe a human soul (B Baba) too enters into body of Mr Dixit. So, NAME OF Mr. DIXIT SHOULD ONCE AGAIN CHANGE, or SHOULD HAVE ANOTHER ADDITIONAL NAME BASED ON THIS, IS IT NOT?
The name changes to Jagadamba, but Jagadamba also plays a part of Mahakali.9)PBKs believe B Baba enters into body of Kamala Devi too. So, name of Kamala Devi should also ONCE AGAIN changed, and/or even she should have another ADDITIONAL NAME, IS IT NOT?