Since Mr Dixit had used the year 1976 as some revelation, he had to invent many such years of revelation. Let us see how and what all years of revelations PBKs have.
1) Nothing tallies as said above. But- OK.sita wrote:We say the Trimurti is played by different personalities, who are there together at the same time. The 33 years each is for when the specific part of the 3 parts is being revealed.
If you like- you may say- what/who is revealed and how-
--in 1936 + 33, = 1969
--1936 + (33+33) = 2002/2003.
PBKs cannot point year 1936 to any of their BVS, because -in their view- in that case, they cannot split into 3 roles.
They will have to point it for B Baba only, and they have done that. They believe- just Krishna Jayanti took place in 1936. - Flaw No. 172 - viewtopic.php?f=39&t=2099&p=51147&hilit ... ced#p51147
Neither Sister Vedanti, nor Kamala Devi or Premkanta came to Yagya in any of these years.
2) More interestingly, the years of revelation- fall as 1936, 1969 and 2003. In this PBK argument, does the role of their Shankar begin from 2003 only?
In PBK view- B baba is not righteous. He is number one false Guru, who committed atrocity on their mother, and is also a ghost. Is this the scale for PBKs to measure righteousness?But if you like to see the Trimurti in one form you can also do that. Baba has said that he has two righteous children - Brahma (who becomes Vishnu) and Shankar. They combine as BapDada in one body. And the third soul is the soul of Shiv.
And- the PBK Guru Mr Dixit took birth from FG(False Gita)?- who had committed countless blunders in understanding Murli points? Nothing tallies.
3) I am asking logical proof, not just trying to fit something. Give details who all left Bk Yagya and joined PBK Yagya in 1976.76 is the year of the revelation of the Father and the year of the birth of Lakshmi and Narayan. But you can also call it as the year of destruction, because in this year the 10 year declaration finishes, for which it was said that the old world will end and the new will begin. In the year 76 also the Sangamyug of 40 years, as said in the Murli finishes. But in the Murli the Sangamyug is also said to be of 50, 60, or 100 years.
BTW- even PBKs have left AIVV, some have joined splinter groups. Do you call that also as a destruction? Is that not more important than BKs leaving BKWSU? In that case, is there any Murli proof mentioning that event too as an year like 1976?
4) And- practically, there is neither Kingdom of PBK LN nor their Jagadamba (after 1998). Just only Mr Dixit/Narayan sitting.
5) Another point is- Why do PBKs point leaving one place (BK Yagya) and joining another place ( AIVV) as destruction?
---Logically speaking- "LEAVING" can be termed as destruction. Leaving one place and joining another place need not be.
----Most important/FUNNY thing is- PBKs claim the Kingdom of LN started in 1976. But, sister Vedanti did not leave BKWSU, and join AIVV, in 1976. And- Mr Dixit had left BKWSU before 1976 itself. So, when the leaders of AIVV had themselves not left BKWSU, and joined AIVV in the year 1976, where do claims of PBKs for the 1976 year stands for?
6) In that case, PBKs inadvertently believe real Brahma is DLR, neither Kamala Devi, nor Dixit.76 is the year of destruction because it is the year of completion. The 100 years of Brahma gets completed. And after the role of Brahma comes the role of Shankar.
So- try to take something and explain fully/properly. Not taking tail of an elephant (DLR) and trying to fit to some other animal (Dixit).
7) So, far, PBKs have done only that. Mostly- PBKs keep their goal itself only to that level.