# Flaw No. 541) AIVV Bifurcation of BK/PBK fails by default itself:-
In BK view- BK = PBK = children of Brahma(= Prajapita= Prajapita Brahma).
363) But, Mr. Dixit bifurcated Brahma and Prajapita and hence
In AIVV view-
---BK = children of just Brahma (B Baba).
---PBK = children of both Prajapita and Brahma (both Mr. Dixit and B Baba (or KD?)
(PBKs may correct me if I am wrong).
364) Now, in AIVV/PBK view
- real Brahma is Kamala Devi. B Baba (Dada Lekhraj) is just "title holder Brahma".
Then how can children of "title holder Brahma" be "real BKs"?
PBKs should call the BKs as "title holder BKs" only, is it not? [in their view]
365) Now, if they call the BKs as "title holder BKs", who are then the "real BKs"?
- :laugh: . PBKs may have to claim it for themselves. Then what is the point in bifurcating PBK from BK?
366) If/since PBKs claim real Brahma is KD, and if they like to use the title BK and PBK as differently, then they are implying that- there should be some children who are children of just Brahma/KD, and not of Dixit.
So- PBKs are inadvertently implying- Miss (or Mrs) KD gives birth to some children without Mr. Dixit!
So- by defaming the title BK and claiming the title PBK superior to it, PBKs have fallen into their own trap - as usual
# Flaw No. 542) AIVV concept of 'title holder Brahma' once again fails by default itself:-
367) In his FP (false propaganda), Mr. Dixit brought the new theory of the so-called 'title holder PRAJAPITA.'
But, unknowingly, he committed spiritual suicide by introducing the concept of 'title holder BRAHMA' too
due to the need of manipulating/misinterpreting a Murli point (explained below).
----In BK view- Brahma = Prajapita. But,
---In PBK view, Brahmas are many(4/5), Prajapita is just one/Dixit.
---In PBK view- all the 4/5 are FULLY VALID
for the title Brahma (they say- KD is first Brahma, then the others one by one).
369) PBKs usually claim B Baba as "title holder Brahma" as well as "title holder Prajapita" - BOTH
But, if we see the PBK theory, they CANNOT USE
- "title holder Brahma".
Because - as said above- all the 4/5 personalities are FULLY ELIGIBLE
for the title Brahma. So- HOW CAN
PBKs claim B Baba (or anyone of the 4/5) as "title holder Brahma?"
370) Due to his inability to recognize a Murli point, (given in Error No. 03 ) - viewtopic.php?f=39&t=2593&p=48702&hilit=daughter#p48702
, Mr. Dixit had to introduce title holder Brahma too. But, he DID NOT
realize that it goes against his own theory of 4/5 Brahmas.
So- it is a DOUBLE FAILURE
of the so-called PBKs [/b]
371) All these prove-
----the intellect level of the so-called Gyani tu(knowledgeable) souls - is LOWER THAN the kindergarten children.
----the DEFENDING ABILITY of PBKs is ABSOLUTELY ZERO, and
----the PBK philosophy is SELF DESTRUCTIVE one,
....due to unlimited ignorance, failures and mutual contradiction with themselves.
Let us wish all the best to them.