So do you accept that the purity that Baba teaches is the purity of the family path in which the effort of both woman and wife are required? You did not answer that.
44) In your earlier post, you mentioned both man and woman, and in this post you are referring to both woman and wife. Trust you are checking what you write?
My reply is-
Drama is variety, and there are varieties of children. baba has said- in yaadgaars, (eg- Dilwada mandir), there are kanyaas, adharkanyaas, etc. So- there will be variety types in BK souls who will reveal Father.
There are BOTH MALES as well as FEMALES, as BKs, who are observing purity in practical life, while interacting with each other EVERY DAY on spiritual service, and supporting each other in the matter of purity of the family path.
So- I believe- It does not matter whether you are a kumar, kumari, married or anything. The matter is to what extent one's drushit and vrutti is pure during sambandh and sampark with others.
Moreover- BK life is a student life. So- there may not be need for everyone to enter into a family path physically to prove gyaan, in the corrupted sense thought to you by your bodily guru.
45) And- I have already said- see point No. 28b) - second para.
46) Again- family path- is not only husband- and wife. It can be Father/parent and children too. It can be brothers and sisters - Why not? Although Brahma Baba is the Father of Saraswati Mama, in the Confluence Age, on a corporeal level, but Spiritually, Saraswati Mama is STILL the soul-mate or yugal-dana of Brahma Baba, is it not?
47) Baba says- that I enter only in one, and he is the fixed Chariot. Does God need to make a female Chariot too as fixed Chariot?
[So- kindly become broad minded, not narrow minded, and keep sounding the bugle that you have 'unlimited clarifications' of Knowledge].
# Flaw No. 499) Another example- of PBKs, speaking lies:-
There is no worship of Brahma, because Brahma is incomplete part.
48) No Murli point says so. Murlis clearly say- Brahma has two roles- Sakar and Avyakt.
Actually, the PBK role is not only incomplete, but also fully handicapped. PBKs believe Sevakram and others had been out of Yagya, and even after 1969/1976, both Mr. Dixit and KD are dependent on subtle DLR.
49) Reason for no worship of Brahma is clearly said in Murlis - Post No. 66 - http://www.brahmakumarisforum.net/chat/ ... sthi#p9508
Read the first Murli point-which clearly says- "Due to presence of ShivBaba, Brahma has not much fame. " - Do PBKs ever address this properly?
SM 12-12-77(2):- ShivBaba samjhaate rahte hain. Kab koyi shaastr nahin uthaayaa jaataa. Baba sunaa rahe hain. Yah bhi kahte hai main sun raha hun. Baba nahin hai toh yah bhi sunaate hain. ISMEY BABA HAI. ISLIYE BRAHMA KAA NAAM ITNAA NAHIN HAI
. Ajmer may ek mandir banaaya hai. Parantu kuch samajhte nahin. Krishn ko Murli dee hai, Saraswati ko Benjo diyaa hai. Godess of Knowledge Saraswati ko kahte hain. GOD OF KNOWLEDGE BRAHMA KE BADLEY PHIR KRISHN KO KAH DIYAA HAI
. Moonhj gaye hain. Baap baith samjhaate hain Trimurti may Krishn toh hai nahin. Bhal karke hain, parantu gupt. RK hee phir LN bante hain. Yah bhi kisko pataa nahin hai. -152-
= ... In THIS one, THERE IS ShivBaba, HENCE THERE IS NOT MUCH FAME OF BRAHMA
... They (Bhakti people) have given Murli to krishn and the veena (like guitar or violin) to Saraswati. Goddess of knowledge is said to S. (But), the title God of knowledge has been given to Krishn instead of Brahma. They are confused.
There are temples of Jagadamba, but they are small. Because she does small service in comparison to Lakshmi.
50) Temple of braahmin/Jagadamba would be small only, because they are physically poor. So- PBK explanation need not be valid.
Another point is- Jagadamba HERSELF becomes Lakshmi, but the people of the outer World, have made small temples of Jagadamba, because she is still in a fluctuating stage in the Confluence Age, so they have made larger temples of her COMPLETE form, as Lakshmi.
[As per Murli point- Jagadamba and Lakshmi are NOT two different souls, but the SAME soul at TWO different time periods. The so-called Gyani-tu atmas, the PBKs, who keep blowing the bugle of 'unlimited clarifications', CANNOT even understand a SIMPLEST matter, like this one - EVEN AFTER REPEATED CLARIFICATIONS!!!]
And there is Murli point that Jagadamba can be called Gyan gyaneshvari and Lakshmi not. And biggest mela is celebrated for Jagadmba, but not for Lakshmi. (it is said that the biggest mela has to be celebrated about Brahmaputra).
51) For braahmins (Brahma and jagadamba) only there would be mela. Lakshmi is a deity.
[Jagadamba of the Confluence Age HERSELF becomes Lakshmi in the Golden Age, BY VIRTUE of having been Gyan gyeaneshvari in the Confluence Age. ONE represents the EFFORT and the OTHER represents the FRUIT. The soul is ONE and the SAME. Come on, brother Sita, at least you should be able to understand this much! IT IS REALLY SO SIMPLE, and SO VERY EASY!]
So one would assume that Lakshmi is not goddess of knowledge, because it is about Lakshmi of the Golden Age who is ignorant, but Baba has said that memorials ore of this time. So Lakshmi is of this time and she is separate than Jagadamba.
52) Due to 50) & 51), this claim does not have any value or any sense, EXCEPT for the PBKs and their bodily guru - CARRY ON!
But, from the above reply of PBKs, they are claiming that service of Conf Aged Lakshmi (sister Vedanti) is higher than that of Jagadmba, PBKs are defaming their own jagadamba
. In other words, PBKs are claiming/implying - Some PBK RudrMala souls are LOWER than Vijayamala souls!