Flaws in PBK Philosophy

An open forum for all ex-BKs, BKs, PBKs, ex-PBKs, Vishnu Party and ALL other Splinter Groups to post their queries to, and debate with, any member of any group congenially.
Post Reply
mbbhat
BK
Posts: 3221
Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Affinity to the BKWSU: BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: I am a Bk and a writer. I have been benefited a lot by the knowledge given in BK institution. I also have materials written totally on logic without BK knowledge. Anyone can get them as attachments for free by email.

Re: Flaws in PBK Philosophy

Post by mbbhat » 05 Mar 2018

# Flaw No. 565) More examples proving flaws in PBK concept of 'TITLE HOLDER' or 'INCHARGE' position:-

501) A lot is already said earlier.
[Refer to Flaw No.s 64, 78, 163, 178, 196, 292, 293, 294, 409, 467, 526, etc.]
Few more points adding to the topic.
----Mr. Dixit had been absent in Yagya for around six months (when he was in jail) in 1998. To whom had he given incharge position?

502)
---Now, from around December 2017 TILL DATE, Mr. Dixit is absconding. Let us consider this absconding also is like taking LEAVE (if PBKs like, because the word ABSCONDING is like a shame). To whom and how the incharge or the title Holder position is given?

------ . ------

# Flaw No. 566) Yaadavaas too riding on PBK Shankar

503) Mr. Dixit is being controlled by lokik worldly laws to such an extent, that he is absconding from past around 3 Months.
So, now, where is Bhakti Marg memorial of this?

mbbhat
BK
Posts: 3221
Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Affinity to the BKWSU: BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: I am a Bk and a writer. I have been benefited a lot by the knowledge given in BK institution. I also have materials written totally on logic without BK knowledge. Anyone can get them as attachments for free by email.

Re: Flaws in PBK Philosophy

Post by mbbhat » 10 Mar 2018

# Flaw No. 567) Mr. Dixit trying to save himself from Bhasmaasur?

504) One of the PBKs believe the three months absconding of Mr. Dixit is his part of saving himself from Bhasmaasur.

PBKs may kindly prove who is Bhasmaasur and how come the role of Bhasmaasur has started just before three months?* - viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2640&p=53562#p53562

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2696&p=53547#p53547

* - The point is - who is Bhasmaasur here? Ex PBKs who had given complaints or lowkik govt/court or ... ?

The same allegations had been put on Mr. Dixit even before. But, why this is special?

Kindly also address about what PBKs mean by independence as well as how many times Mr. Dixit enters into his so called (spiritual) womb.

mbbhat
BK
Posts: 3221
Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Affinity to the BKWSU: BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: I am a Bk and a writer. I have been benefited a lot by the knowledge given in BK institution. I also have materials written totally on logic without BK knowledge. Anyone can get them as attachments for free by email.

Re: Flaws in PBK Philosophy

Post by mbbhat » 10 Jun 2019

# Flaw No. 568) In PBK view-

---number of chariots are only 2,
---God speaks Murlis through 3,
---number of Brahmas are 5! and
---claim in whomsoever Shiv enters, they should be named as Brahma, but limit number of Brahmas to FIVE!!!
--- -

Total foolishness, is it not?
http://bk-pbk.info/viewtopic.php?f=2&t= ... omb#p49060

30 May 2015, 17:43

VCD 1259, C.No.1745, Dhulawadi (Nepal),
Mu. 28.09.68, Dt. 04.03.10
Part-3

You should not become ready to accept anything without proof and evidence. Yes, the Father says: I ride this permanent Chariot (body) and explain to you children. A permanent Chariot as well as a temporary Chariot is mentioned. [The Father] says: Whichever body I enter, I name it as Brahma. So, is there one Brahma or are there many [Brahmas]? There is certainly one Brahma but there is one permanent Chariot, and is there [just] one Brahma? There are many Brahmas. When there is one permanent Chariot and there are many Brahmas, ...
In PBK view, there are only two chariots, temporary and permanent.
But, they claim God spoke Murlis or gave knowledge regularly for years through three chariots (from 1937 till 1942, through Sevakram *(or previous birth of Mr. Dixit); from 1942 till 1947, through previous birth of Kamala Devi; from 1947 till 1969, through B Baba; from 1969 till 1976 (absent?!); from 1976 onward, through present body of Mr. Dixit.


PBKs (mis)use the Murli point saying "In whom I enter, that Chariot should be named as Brahma" to manipulate the right figure (of Brahma) from ONE to FIVE.

But, when the Murli point says - whomsoever I enter, it should be named as Brahma, PBKs limit number of Brahmas only to 5. How come? Who has given them such authority to (mis)interpret the Murli point?

This proves that they PBKs take the Murli points FOR GRANTED. they deeply fail to realize that they have fallen into their own trap, and are hence definitely highest Kumbhkarnas.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests