# Flaw No. 108)What is wrong if a human being says - I am human, a doctor says I am doctor, or God says- I am God, or even a dog says- I am dog?
You see them as virgins, but ShivBaba has declared them to be mothers. Obviously you are trying to prove yourself to be superior to God. Moreover, nobody can claim that Shiv entered in them. It is Shiv Himself who clarifies or reveals the parts of 4/5 Brahmas.
1)Baba has said in Murlis that- anyone(any human being) who says or
even IMPLIES that (s)he is God, is Hiranyakashyap.
"No Murli point says- Chariot/Brahma should not claim or acknowledge that he is Chariot/Brahma". On the contrary, if he does not acknowledge that he is the Chariot, then that would be considered to be an INSULT to God, and one who does not act with due humility to acknowledge what God Himself has OPENLY declared AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN. It is again part of false propaganda of Mr Dixit, which is very simple to understand. Because
MR DIXIT KNOWS VERY WELL THAT GOD CANNOT ENTER EITHER IN HIM OR ANY OF HIS BRAHMAS. So, he is fooling PBKs by TWISTING the Murli points to project same
as Shrimat, when it is CLEARLY 'manmath, kumath, mayavimath & ravanmath', as AMPLY DEMONSTRATED & PROVED on this forum, BEYOND THE SLIGHTEST DOUBT WHATSOEVER.
2)Of course, it will not look good if a person/doctor REPETITIVELY says- I am doctor, I am doctor. And, sometimes it may look awkward for the Chariot to say- I am the Chariot, to LOWKIK people who are NOT in the Knowledge. But, there is absolutely no problem if spoken within the family for upliftment of children or for service. [In Murlis, we can see ShivBaba has used both the ways of explaining- "That Father, He (instead of saying I)", sometimes "I, Me" as well.
3)Actually, Mr. Dixit can never say or explain when and how God entered into the so-called 4 to 5 Brahmas. Hence he gave a statement, one who claims so is HK. By saying so,
he is keeping himself safe from the need to reply to the queries of others. Also he has taken law into his own hands to give any title to anyone, whenever he likes.
4)But, Mr Dixit has given CLEAR STATEMENTS regarding entrance of God(of course without any logic or PROPER proof from Murli points)- but he did it to cook up his theory, as he found a small chance to mis-interpret the Murli point- see error No. 29 -
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=2593&p=50566&hilit=Radha#p50566)
Now, Mr Dixit can give such a clear statement about entrance of Shiv in the two or three personalities, and till 1947 also. But, even after so many years, he could not say how was Shiv's role in Mr Dixit, and other 4 to 5 Brahmas after 1969. The reason is-
he can neither explain, nor prove it. If he tries to explain, he will get caught even more.
5)Also- Mr Dixit can give a clear statement regarding sister Vedanti-who has not yet come to AIVV. He can say who would be her husband in Satgyug.
But, Mr Dixit cannot say in advance that who would be life-partner of Kamala Devi in heaven, or what her role is there. The reason is very simple to understand. Because, Mr Dixit tried to project trimurtis as three DIFFERENT souls, a total IMBALANCE, and then he started equating 2 = 3. And has been doing lots of JUGGLING exercises CONTINUOUSLY on these.
# Flaw No. 109)Three real holders and two title holders!-
6)Of the three personalities, Mr Dixt can get just one match. So, how can he explain about the third?
So, he is like handicapped here.
7)More blunders can be seen here. As per PBKs, there are three real personalities in Trimurti, (Dixit, Kamala Devi, and Vedanti), but only two title holders? It is unfortunate thing for Mr Dixit, as he could get only two souls from BKWSU (DLR and Mama) to fit into three PBK personalities.
8)Due to these 2 plus 3, Mr. Dixit thought to say- there can be 4 to 5 Brahmas. But, why not 4 or 5 Vishnu or 4 to 5 Shankars?
9)PBKs believe DLR and Jagadamba were title Holder Brahma and title holder Jagadamba. Now, what do they believe about other Brahmas?
How many of them are REAL Brahmas and just TITLE HOLDERS, and how?
10)Why Mr. Dixit did not create title holder personalities in V and S? The reason is simple- In BKWSU "roles of Vishnu or Shankar in Conf. Age" is not present or discussed enough. In BKWSU there are roles of Brahma and Jagadamba only during Conf. Age.
So, his explanation is limited only to that level. His false propaganda can be realized from this.
11)But, as per their own logic, they should give at least title holder Jagadamba to someone from 1998, as Kamala Devi is out of Yagya from 1998. But he cannot give, although PBKs believe it to be Sr Yogini. Because then total number of Brahmas would become 6! So, do they believe there are 6 heads to Brahma?
12)In splinter groups,
some have kept their names as Vishnu, Prajapita, etc, and even Shankar. Now, what does Mr Dixit call them? Title holder Shankar and Vishnus too? If not ,why? Let us see what clarifications Mr Dixit gives about their teachings.
13)Most probably, the last splinter group believes -
DLR as title holder Brahma and Mr Dixit as TITLE HOLDER Shankar, and mostly even Dasharath Patel as title holder Vishnu, and he himself as above all the roles - Shiva- the final. I did not discuss anything with them, just listened to what they spoke. [Anyhow, more discussions about them - better if done in the relevant sub forums. But views of AIVV about the splinter groups can be put here].
14)Not sure whether Mr Dixit will sit (in future) and read the Murlis/teachings of the splinter groups too, and give clarifications about them.
15)Not sure- in future, Mr Dixit may say- soul of DLR goes even to the splinter groups to speak Vanis there also.
Actually, PBKs should believe so. Because PBKs believe DLR has attachment to both BKs as well PBKs, so why not to the splinter groups too?
They too believe or quote Murli points (which were words which came through mouth of DLR). So, we can see how Mr. Dixit will fall into his own trap.
16)MOST IMPORTANTLY- ACCORDING TO PBK LOGIC- The entry of Krishna/DLR can be predicted. So, they should be able to predict when DLR enters into Dixit, or Kamala Devi or anyone. But, so far none of the so called gyaani tu atmas have ever tried to give this. It is impossible for them to give, as they do not know.They can only point fingers at others.
17)So, in short, the whole of PBK philosophy can be summarized in just one sentence-
"Having intention and ability just only to point fingers at others and "- totally handicapped and fully dependent on them
18)The Murli point which says- "In whom ever I enter, his name should be kept as Brahma", has any PBk thought why?
The reply is simple. Lowkik people used to question- how can BKs call DLR as Brahma? For that baba replied- Arey- "from where Brahma can come? Srushti is anaadi, I do not create a new world. I TRANSFORM/PURIFY THE IMPURE WORLD. I have to come in impure world, in an impure body, enter in him and adopt braahmins through him to begin role of creation(which is actually role of Brahma). So- I have to name him as Brahma. Even if you do not accept DLR as Brahma, you will have to accept someone other of Iron Aged personality only, WHOEVER IT MAY BE. So, your this question will have no answer other than this". This is why Baba repetitively says in Murli- "I need impure body, I come in thorns, I come in meeting of monkeys". Because for lowkik people, it is not easy to accept God can enter an impure body of Kaliyug.
Without having any ability to understand the real meaning, PBKs are in the complete trap of Mr. Dixit, as per drama.
