Again just weak argument. In that case (as per your argument), Baba would have said- just name is wrong. But, Baba is referring to the scriptures- where the word 'Prajapita' is also given to many Brahmas, not just to one.sita wrote:I don't think your translation is correct. I think the meaning is rather....Although one Daksh Prajapita is also mentioned...I think what Baba likes to say is that it is right to say Prajapita Brahma and it is wrong to say Daksh Prajapita.
Regarding even the name, Baba has corrected that the right name is Lakhiraj, the lowkik name itself! (see the Murli point in the same post- flaw No. 335, neither Mr. Dixit, nor Sevakram. - :laugh: Where do PBKs have any room to argue?- except saying my cock has three legs?
Just juggling exercises from PBKs, with CORRUPTED & INVERTED INTELLECTS, like their bodily guru, Mr. Dixit.It is said that we are all Parvatis, Sitas*, we have one husband and we are wives. Shiva is ever pure, but he is ever pure even when he is in a corporeal body. It is the sanyasis who call women impure, and if you come in contact with them one becomes impure. Baba praises mothers and their ability to follow purity and has put the responsibility on them, and not on sanyasis. Sanyasis do great service, but they cannot create heaven, because in heaven there is the happiness of the family path. Ganga is patron of the sanyasis, who do the great service of purity of the sanyasy type. Parvati follows the true Godly path of the family path. We don’t become pure by knowledge being narrated to us, but by Yoga. Yoga is union, love. Shiv and Shakti are one. Shiv and Ganga are not one.
Ganga is shown ALWAYS merged with Shiv/Shankar (placed in the head- the highest place of person). Parvati is shown sitting by the side of Shankar (except in pictures of ardhnaareeshwar/i, she is shown as half of Shankar). Even in that picture, Ganga would be always shown as being seated on head of Shiv/Shankar/Parvati. GANGA IS INSEPARABLE, but Parvati is separable.
The very fact that Ganga is given the Supreme place in the body of Shankar, implies that the status of Ganga is SUPERIOR to the status of Parvati! Souls who are body-conscious would only see the physical body of Parvati, ALWAYS by the side of Shankar! ONLY souls who are soul-conscious would understand that Shankar is FULLY & CONSTANTLY ABSORBED in Ganga, who is CONSTANTLY FLOWING from his TRESSES - re-vitalizing and re-energizing him - and responsible for the ULTIMATE, PRACTICAL PURIFICATION of SOULS, as well as MATTER! Therefore, body conscious souls would consider Parvati as the corporeal consort of Shankar, since they can see ONLY with their physical eyes, and CANNOT PERCEIVE with their THIRD EYE; WHEREAS, the ACTUAL Spiritual consort of Shankar is Ganga - the SUBTLEST ASPECT of whom TRANSFORMS into Saraswati - ONLY SEEN with the THIRD EYE!!!
IMPURE Parvati TRANSFORMS into PURE Ganga, and then works on a SUBTLE level as Saraswati, before FINALLY manifesting as Laskshmi!
They are NOT DIFFERENT SOULS, they REPRESENT the functions of the SAME ONE SOUL at DIFFERENT LEVELS of SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION!
'Parvat-i' (from the mountain) (IMPURE soul in an IMPURE corporeal body) originates from the JAGGED & RUGGED mountains of BODY-CONSCIOUSNESS, on this corporeal sphere, and after drinking the NECTAR ('Amrit') in the form of the 'Story of Immortality' ('amarkatha'), DEVELOPS into 'Par Vritti' (ATTITUDE of DETACHMENT from body-consciousness), and transforms into PURE Ganga, (after absorbing the Life-giving-Herbs - 'Sanjivini Bhutti' - in the form of Pure Versions of Knowledge), (RELATIVELY Pure soul in a RELATIVELY Pure corporeal body), and then manifests as the ELUSIVE, MYSTIC, SUBTLE Saraswati (to execute the purifying functions - operating through a subtle body), (RELATIVELY Pure soul in a subtle, ANGELIC body), EVENTUALLY manifesting as Lasksmi on this corporeal sphere (COMPLETELY PURE soul in a COMPLETELY PURE corporeal body).
Similar processes are followed by all other CONCERNED souls, although number-wise.
BTW- PBKs believe it is DLR who plays role of female in Ardh-Naareeshwar(AN). In Bhakti acriptures, Parvati itself is shown as the female. So, in PBK view, it should imply that DLR is Parvati! (if they use scriptures to prove their stance).
But, PBKs say- Parvati is sister Vedanti! - who is never combined with their Shankar either intellectually (yet to realize their knowledge), or practically!
What are PBKs saying???
If PBKs like to call even Ganga as cowardice/weak, they bring their level even lower! Baba says- you all are gyaan-gangas! Do PBKs believe they are not gyaan gangas? - :laugh:
Ganga is not patron of just sanyaasis. She is respected and worshipped by all even house-hold path people.
BTW- How many temples are there of Parvati? Most of the temples of Shiv/Shankar are just single, WITHOUT PARVATI! Where is household path memorials of Parvati IN PRACTICAL?
* - Does not Baba say you all are 'gyaan gangas'? Why do you leave it and take only half? It is PBKs who like to take just half, use in twisted way, and then claim something like so called extra-ordinary clarification, and then fall into their own pit - WITHOUT EVEN REAL-EYEsing that they have ACTUALLY FALLEN into the DEEPEST PIT!!!
Anyhow- it is Drama, nothing wrong even from their side.