there is another story. The way you went about it getting it out is the wrong way.
You're right no one will discuss but wrong to go about accusing about "rape".
It seems that there was 'sex' ... which I take it is why the Vishnu Party are so "morally outraged" by it, and the BKs exploiting it
... but the question is, was it consensual sex. As I understand it, Virendra Dev Dixit made love to many of the original PBK sisters and at least one was encouraged to file an accusation of rape ... by either the BKs, ex-PBKs or Vishnu Party people at a later date. It did not stick as it would be very difficult to prove and may not have been ... but all of the anti-PBKs are using the newspaper cuttings to try and make the PBKs look at bad as they can.
Now, for me, the sexual aspect is not necessary a bad thing at all. In fact, spiritually I think it is a good thing *if* it was consensual (as in agreed to).
I can imagine how, for Virendra Dev Dixit, it was "proof" of his being the "lusty thorn" mentioned in the Murlis.
I can imagine how morally outrage the Vishnu Party people would be from a middle class Hindu point of view, but I find them too ridiculous at times to take seriously. They seem to me to be yet another bunch trying to start a business-religion off the backs of the BKWSU.
So, the big question would be, was it truly "consensual"? As in, did one or two sisters feel pressurized to do so? (Undue influence it is called). That is possible ... but we don't know because no one will talk honestly about it all.
Unfortunately, doing what you did to "Spoil the soup" only sends the PBKs back into a defensive mode and shuts them up.
I am sorry but I disrespect for you doing so and spoiling this topic as I am genuinely interested in following news stories. It does not mean I have to believe but I am just interested to watch how the two sides of this war are moving around each other.