Who is it that sets the rules of what is right or not to ask BapDada ...
*Again*, you are attempting to provoke by insulting my mental or rather 'conforming' capacity. Please stop. It is not divine behavior.mbbhat wrote:It is drama!
So- I should say- once gain that such questions who ask are, their understanding capacity is really less.
There is no such thing as "Drama". Drama *does* not do anything. It does not order, it does not act, it does not think, it does not decide ... you should ask yourself what exactly is meant by the BKs' use of the word "Drama". Drama does not *do*, it merely *is*. Even according to the BKs' knowledge, what *does* ... what creates and effects reality around us ... are souls.
According to the BKs' knowledge, remove the souls and all you have is empty, inert dust (of course, according to scientific knowledge, evolution would carry on without human beings just as it carried on for 100s of millions of years *before* human beings evolved).
Who is it that censors what is right or not to ask BapDada, are the inner circle of elite BKs. We could name them exactly by name, and we can go right back to the 1970s to document how the censorship, and their strange monopoly on BapDada, has grown. I mean, if he is the "Ocean of Knowledge", all pure and wise and not bound by tiredness and so on, would not it be a good thing to put his intellect to new things and better purposes?
Are his "rallying of the troops" lectures *really* that wonderful and inspired? They are pretty shallow and repetitive. I am sure "god" must be capable of better.
I apologise for correcting your English again but you are incorrect to use the "understand" too. When the BKs use the word "understand", what they really mean is "conform to what we are told to think".
It is not even a question of "agree with what the BKWSU teaches to think" ... it is "to rigidly and unerringly conform" (and become stupid) which is why when a student like Virendra Dev Dixit or others come along who do ask why and ask for explanations for the inconsistencies and contradictions within Gyan, they respond by pushing them out and banishing them, like some medieval religion rather than a true university.
A true university would encourage Advance Research.
Yes, you are correct. My "conforming capacity" is less, however, my questioning capacity ... which is the opposite and I argue more virtuous and valuable ... is not great but good.
I appreciate it is the BKs' manner not to ask, not to think and not to ask why, e.g. according to them "3 dots" sums up entire existence, and you should consider why. What is being achieved by such simplification?
There is very little to grasp or understand about BK philosophy. It is designed to be so simple a child or uneducated person can use it, and it is designed to stop thoughts, to stop individuals thinking, to make them buddhus. That is the goal of it.
Drama does not do, it does not dictate. The use of the word Drama and the concept of "fixed in Drama" is just a shorthand, not real and raises the problem of predetermination versus freewill within the BK philosophy again. On one hand they say, "everything is fixed in Drama" (pre-determined), on the other hand they say, "everything depends on efforts" (free will). It is a very old philosophical problem known as the paradox of free will, or theological fatalism.
Actually, "nothing is fixed in Drama". "Fixed in Drama" is not a true statement, it is just a yukti to stop people worrying or asking too many, possibly unanswerable questions. It is basically a polite way of telling people to shut up, or shut their mind up.
"Why ... why ... why... ?" Answer, "... fixed in Drama".
So tell us, what is your understanding capacity of "Drama", mbbhat?