Corruption in BK head is like corruption in UPA-2 (Congress)

[rmn]

My dear soul brother sita, Actually I got better opinion on u so far but u have melted it. Being a Indian nationality we should not compare any govt. which is ruling the India, if any of the MP sees this site and comenting on upa govt. the site BK-PBK.info will land in trouble and we could not have forum to discuss the Baba's Murli points. Pl think like Baba's children and protect this forum or site.
thank
rmn

[Roy]

My dear soul brother sita, Actually I got better opinion on u so far but u have melted it.

You are so fickle brother, it doesn't take much to upset you does it! We are here to discuss knowledge, not to worry about if every little thing we say is being monitored by big brother... We should enjoy our freedom of speech while it lasts, because there is no guarantee it will in this world.

[fluffy bunny]

... we should not compare any govt. which is ruling the India, if any of the MP sees this site and comenting on upa govt. the site BK-PBK.info will land in trouble ...

According to a recent CSDS poll, two out of three Indians feel that the UPA-2 is corrupt and that corruption has increased over the last four years.

The 2G Spectrum Telecom scam (Time magazine listed it as only the second biggest corruption scandal In the world after Watergate), the Adarsh Housing Society Scam, the corrupt Defence deals, the coal scam which is just surfacing, the ISRO S-band deal and the Commonwealth Games scam ...

May I recommend the wonderful I Paid A Bribe website?

Relax rmn, no one cares about obscure metaphysical chit-chat. Relax and enjoy yourself. What other people think and do is their own responsibility.

Are you sure it is not the BK elite you are worried about? Have you have bad experience with them ... or are you a BK yourself?

[jyothirling]

One can easily associate the behavior of upa government and BK administration. Both have an affinity to Islam.

You must read the Murli and you will find out i come in this person who has stone intelect( Virendra Dev Dixit) and souls who have monkey intellect and I transform them into diamond. No body is claiming BKs are more fallen than PBKs. The issue here is you need to put two and two togather. The source of vikar came from vidharmy souls who do not accept supreme diety. At this time every one is fallen and challenge is bigger for most fallen. We are all doing effort. And PBKs claim that we will be successful because god is with us. The difference in BK and PBKs are that BKs do not take Yagya serously and invest time in decorating where as PBKs are honest and cleaning up the Islamic way of thinking which is vikari. Definitely PBKs have no history of taking money from people and not being accountable for the money if it is taken for food or accommodation. You can support BK and prove god is with them. You are also welcome to look into the past of PBKs and expect them to be impure for eternity. that is your choice.

[sita]

Maybe we can trace the crticism of the Congress in the Murli in the fact that some part of the Anti Om mandli movement was influenced by the Satyagraha movement at that time, that is the Congress, by identifying Dada Lekraj as supporting the landlords, due to the fact he was paying rents for their houses whilst at that time there was movement against the landlords by the Satyagraha movement.

Ín the Murli it is said that Congress are those who don't believe in Christ (also some play of words), they don't believe in any religion that is the Arya Samajh. Arya Samajh was also helping the satyagraha movement.

[jyothirling]

The matter that is discussed should only be applied to Brahmins. The congress in a Brahmin family means the one who makes too much noise and create friction among Godly students. The corruption means corruption of five vices. The corruption of five vices is the main problem when the beginning of Yoga because nobody knew the soul consciousness at that time. Now we know the Father who teaches and we know the Father who is neutral and teach nobody nothing. If the Supreme Soul teaches us then he become the part of the drama. He cannot be part of the drama because he is impartial. The Father who teaches us is actually part and he wants to separate the Brahmins from asur and sur. He teaches that by coming to color and company of good Brahmins you become good. Some Brahmins are in angelic stage and they do good service while other Brahmins in angelic service and they do bad service. The role of Maya is mentioned every day in the knowledge. If Supreme Soul Shiv gives us the knowledge then he will be in trouble for not giving knowledge to 5 billion souls. Knowledge is from the Father who lives and he gives it every single souls of every single religion on earth. Therefore he is also free from accusations. If Shiv make only Brahmins who takes 84 birth pure then he cannot be called purifier of souls. He is the energy source only and it is up to the kings of each religion to tap into that energy and it is up to the souls capacity too. the aim of the message is to keep the congress like Brahmins out of our frienship circle and keep good Brahmins in our family circle and friendship circle. Any Brahmin who do not respect 84 birth drama and story is asur Brahmin and they are not the part of Godly family. they can be part of other dynasty and families.

[jyothirling]

If you think that BKs are doing the shooting of Islam, then what is the religion of PBKs (who have all emerged from BK-Islam).??

जिज्ञासुः ब्रह्मा का दिन-रात है, प्रजापिता का क्यों नहीं?

बाबाः ब्रह्मा का दिन-रात कहा जाता है, प्रजापिता का दिन-रात नहीं कहा जाता क्योंकि प्रजापिता तो मुकर्रर रथ है। मुकर्रर रथ में शिव हमेशा ही प्रवेश है कि कभी नहीं है – ऐसा भी है? वो तो मुकर्रर रथ है। जब मुकर्रर रथ है तो सदैव ज्ञानयुक्त ही होगा या ज्ञानहीन भी होगा? (सभी- ज्ञानयुक्त ही होगा।) और ब्रह्मा? ब्रह्मा कोई मुकर्रर रथ तो है नहीं। कभी है कभी नहीं है। होते हुए भी अर्थ का पता नहीं है। सन् ६८ तक ब्रह्मा में प्रवेश किया। प्रवेश हुआ भी, प्रवेश भी था, फिर भी जो बोला गया, उसके अर्थ का पता ही नहीं । तो हुआ, हुआ, न हुआ बराबर हो गया।

Student: When there is the day and night of Brahma, why isn’t there the day and night of Prajapita?

Baba: It is said Brahma’s day and night; it is not said Prajapita’s day and night because Prajapita is the permanent Chariot. Shiva is always present in the permanent Chariot or is it that He is not present in him sometimes? He is the permanent Chariot. When it is the permanent Chariot, will he always be knowledgeable or will he also lack in knowledge? (Everyone said: He will be knowledgeable.) And what about Brahma? Brahma is not the permanent Chariot. Sometimes he is (a Chariot) and sometimes he isn’t. Even if he is [the Chariot] he does not know the meaning. He entered in Brahma till the year 68. Although he had entered, although he was in him, he did not know the meaning at all. So, it is one and the same whether he is [a Chariot] or not. ....एक शिव बाबा दूसरा न कोई ....ॐ शांति... वार्तालाप 570.

You think about it and provide me your antagonistic counter arguement
Om Shanti
jyothirling

[shivsena]

You think about it and provide me your antagonistic counter arguement
Om Shanti
jyothirling

Imo, Brahma ki raat means that nobody(BKs-PBKs) know who is the real Brahma(badi-Maa) during Brahma ki raat(night of ignorance) and Brahma ka din means when Brahma becomes Vishnu in one second.(Revelation period)

[jyothirling]

Could you please back up with more mural points please.( why do you think the PBKs claim Brahma Baba went through nigh and day is wrong). The rath and day is about knowledge and I honestly do not think it is about the perfection. If it was about perfection then 2500 years day and 25000 years night. How can you find this logic in todays Brahmin world. Could you take time and write at least 250 word essay. With supporting Murli points. Please take a month or even 3 months. It is up to you . No hurry or accusation. I respect you as long as you are honest effort maker.

[mbbhat]

जिज्ञासुः ब्रह्मा का दिन-रात है, प्रजापिता का क्यों नहीं?

बाबाः ब्रह्मा का दिन-रात कहा जाता है,प्रजापिता का दिन-रात नहीं कहा जाता क्योंकि प्रजापिता तो मुकर्रर रथ है। मुकर्रर रथ में शिव हमेशा ही प्रवेश है कि कभी नहीं है – ऐसा भी है? वो तो मुकर्रर रथ है। जब मुकर्रर रथ है तो सदैव ज्ञानयुक्त ही होगा या ज्ञानहीन भी होगा? (सभी- ज्ञानयुक्त ही होगा।) और ब्रह्मा? ब्रह्मा कोई मुकर्रर रथ तो है नहीं। कभी है कभी नहीं है। होते हुए भी अर्थ का पता नहीं है। सन् ६८ तक ब्रह्मा में प्रवेश किया। प्रवेश हुआ भी, प्रवेश भी था, फिर भी जो बोला गया, उसके अर्थ का पता ही नहीं । तो हुआ, हुआ, न हुआ बराबर हो गया।

Student: When there is the day and night of Brahma, why isn’t there the day and night of Prajapita?

Baba: It is said Brahma’s day and night; it is not said Prajapita’s day and night because Prajapita is the permanent Chariot. Shiva is always present in the permanent Chariot or is it that He is not present in him sometimes? He is the permanent Chariot. When it is the permanent Chariot, will he always be knowledgeable or will he also lack in knowledge? (Everyone said: He will be knowledgeable.) And what about Brahma? Brahma is not the permanent Chariot.

Sometimes he is (a Chariot) and sometimes he isn’t. Even if he is [the Chariot] he does not know the meaning. He entered in Brahma till the year 68. Although he had entered, although he was in him, he did not know the meaning at all. So, it is one and the same whether he is [a Chariot] or not. ....एक शिव बाबा दूसरा न कोई ....ॐ शांति... वार्तालाप 570.

SM 14-6-73(3):- Baap to sath hi batate hain. Unki hai srimat. Doosree hai Brahma ki math. Zaroor Baap se hi Brahma ko math mili. Brahma abhi raath may hain. Brahma ka din aur Brahma ki raath to BKKyon ki bhi din aur raath. PRAJAPITA Brahma KI RAATH TO BACHCHON KI BHI RAATH HONGI. – 86

= Father says only truth. His is srimath. The second is Brahma’s math. Definitely from Father only Brahma got math/directions. Brahma is now in night. When it is day and night of Brahma, it is also day and night of BKs. When it is night of Prajapita Brahma, it is also night of children.

[arjun]

In most of the pictures and Murlis it is written Brahma's night and day and not Prajapita Brahma night and day. So, just one Murli cannot disprove what Baba has said in thousands of Murlis.

[mbbhat]

In most of the pictures and Murlis it is written Brahma's night and day and not Prajapita Brahma night and day. So, just one Murli cannot disprove what Baba has said in thousands of Murlis.

In most/thounsands of the Murlis, it is said- Brahma is Prajapita.

In no Murli, it is said- Brahma and Prajapita Brahma are different. [ It is by (their own) interpretation (which has no strong support and unable to understand the typing errors in Murlis) only PBKs have come up with that new theory. Still a PBK says as if thousands of Murlis say both are different. God knows! ]


But, the above Murli point directly says- Night of Prajapita Brahma- which needs no interpretation or fully independent of interpretation.


Thank you for the great reply. At least some of the PBKs now have started to say that what we argue should agree with most of the Murlis. A real positive approach. Good.

[sita]

I think the Congress party, the Kauravas is related to the Arya samajis, not to Islam.