I asked you to explain what the motives behind my child abuse work were. I did this because you seemed to indicate that you had some information about them. At no point did I ask you your opinion on anything.
Given the opinions you have expressed about me and I repeat these are unsolicited, I feel that I am entitled to ask you about them. You have stated that I find the BKs repulsive, I left the BKs with bitterness, I bully and harass people and that I want to find cases of child abuse etc.
You haven’t said these to me in private you have said them in public. Or to be more precise you have said them from a position of anonymity but in a public forum. So everybody knows the victim of your words but nobody knows who is saying them. Surely the situation requires that you at least back up your claims with some solid information. Surely any third parties who read this exchange are entitled to know if there is any substance behind your language?
You keep stressing that you might be wrong as if the utterance of such absolves you from taking responsibility for your words. Well let us find out if you are wrong and let us see how you act if indeed it turns out that you are wrong. If you have good cause to criticise me I am certainly willing to be criticised. That is one of the reasons I put my name to my report. But if you have nothing of substance or fact to say and it is just gratuitous and lazy verbal violence both I and everyone else who sees this is entitled to know.
So I repeat:
- 1 Please explain the real motives in my child abuse work.
2 When did I say that I find the BKs repulsive?
3 When did I say that I left the BKs with bitterness?
4 Who have I bullied and harassed and when?
5 On what basis can you claim I have been desperate to find more examples of child abuse?