Latter day BKWSU students ARE NOT aware of the phase of the Yagya being disccussed in this topic, for it is 'hidden' from us. Once on this forum I made some remarks about the historians vs Godly students aspect of our engagement here. Since that time, as things have unfolded, I have had to concede to myself that charting the genesis of the BKWSU is immensely important. So thanks to all of those who have contributed to this quest.
Reading the BKWSU published Sakar Murli of the 4th December 2006 one comes across the following segment:
... The significance of the cycle should be explained. First of all, they should understand that it is the incorporeal Supreme Father, the Supreme Soul, who speaks knowledge to you. When someone says that you only listen to Brahma, tell him: No, we don't listen to bodily beings. The Supreme Father, the Supreme Soul, explains to us through this one. We don't believe this one (Brahma) to be the Supreme Soul. The Father of all is Shive and the inheritance is received from Him. It is through this one. You don't receive anything from Brahma. What is his praise? All the praise belongs to the one Shive. If He did not come in this one, how could you have come here? Shiv Baba has adopted you through Brahma and this is why you are called BKs. There has to be the Brahmin clan. No human being or scripture can show you the path to liberation or liberation-in-life. Only the Incorporeal Supreme Father, the Supreme Soul, the Bestower of Salvation, shows you the path. ...
Typically, we BKWSU students read that without batting an eyelid. However, what if those Murli points are read in and/or explained to us in the context of this thread? Would we realise that those words represent a BKWSU clarification
of a previously misunderstood aspect of Godly knowledge? A misunderstanding that they, the Seniors, were under and that God had to put right in no uncertain terms?
Does the BKWSU Murli contain similar 'revisions' that get passed off as original Godly teachings as if they (the teachings) were, are and always will be
understood in a way that rightfully accord Shiv Baba the part of The Supreme Soul?
In case my poor English clouds the issue, maybe we can read the Murli extract again and see if it is possible to discern the feeling of a clarification
in the classic sense of the word.
When not read as a clarification the same Murli point can serve as usual to show the BKs as undisputable 'keepers of the ultimate Godly truths' when in fact it may well be the case that Murli revisions are indeed just that. Revisions! Re-interpretations of previously misunderstood Godly knowledge rather than a straightforward re-publication of unchanging knowledge (as the BKWSU would have us believe they are). Is Gyan really and truly 'evolving'? What else has been thrown out on the sly? Why don't we get the real history of the Yagya and the ongoing geneses of Godly knowledge presented to us in clear and honest terms?
If it was not for one invaluable lamp of Baba's eyes I do not know how I would have had a chance to enjoy these churnings, so thanks to all of you who are serving the unlimited Yagya in this way. Long may it continue.