References from SM and AV are not used to call others as idiots and rascals but are used to support one's views.sachkhand wrote:
Is anything wrong in doing this?
Shivsena has openly stated that now he does not beleive AK as True knowledge on the contrary a web of Maya to misguide the spiritual students of ShivBaba.
And for his theory, he has to depend on SM and AV to prove himself right. Everyone does the same thing.
BKs do the same thing by using some Shlokas of BhagwadGita scripture. Veerendra Dev Dixit did the same thing. Used Murlis to condemn the interpretations of Murlis by BKWSU and challenged BKs by saying that Dada Lekharaj is not at all Prajapita Brahma. And used the same SM and AV even to prove some BKs as heads of Ravan.
So, why single out Shivsena? Even I will have to use SM and AV points to prove my opinion or views about ShivBaba and His knowledge. For that matter everyone will do the same thing.
It is so obvious that you like to preach but never practise what you have mentioned.But, personally I feel now that it is not much useful in keep on debating.
wow! you are going to make things happen practically with your might and light. Do it practically and all of us will hail 'Prajapita Sachkhand.'Now the time is to make things happen and not just preach.