8 q's to answer

DEDICATED to BKs.
For those involved with the Brahma Kumaris, to discuss issues about the BKWSU in a free and open manner.
Post Reply
kand_72
Posts: 19
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Affinity to the BKWSU: Academic
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: I would like to contribute meaningfully to the discussions.

8 q's to answer

Post by kand_72 » 16 May 2011

8 critical q's which will change everything in this Rudra Gyaan Yagya....
1. If the Supreme Soul is not omnipresent, then where is the omnipotent soul present?

2. If Shiva & Shankar are 2 separate souls, how come are they addressed as one? Please give us reasons?

3. If soul (atma) is not equal to the Supreme Soul (paramatma), then for who do we sing that atma & paramatma are on & the same?

4. If Gita sermonizer is not lord Krishna, then how can we claim Shiv as the sermonizer?

5. If the purifier of sins is not Ganges, then why is Ganges shown on the forehead of Shankar?

6. Different religious leaders & spiritual gurus have provided more than 108 versions of Gita, and then according to BK knowledge why is it not possible to explain the Gita?

7. If all the scriptures are wrong, then why did Brahma baba keep saying that even if Brahma comes down to earth, we will not drop the scriptures.

8. If Shankar & Vishnu were not present actually, then why is it that there are so many temples & idols dedicated to both?

Please provide logical answers & no unwanted fights & ego clashes.

Provide Murli dates as much as possible to substantiate your explanation.

These q's are open to all groups.. let the best prevail!!

The world is waiting for the right answers that needs to be known to all.

User avatar
avyakt7
Posts: 53
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Affinity to the BKWSU: BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: Mainly to share Gyan. Understand view points and to enjoy the "process"...
Location: The world
Contact:

Re: 8 q's to answer

Post by avyakt7 » 16 Sep 2011

1. If the Supreme Soul is not omnipresent, then where is the omnipotent soul present?

"omnipotent"= Bhakti term. There is predestination.

2. If Shiva & Shankar are 2 separate souls, how come are they addressed as one? Please give us reasons?

More Bhakti.... Gyan clearly states that Shiva is incorporeal and that Shiva never experiences having his own body. Everyone else experience their own body. Therefore, Shankar had to be a human being and if so numberwise and if so, Shiva cannot incarnate in him for Shiva is related with the number 1 soul only (Brahma.)

3. If soul (atma) is not equal to the Supreme Soul (paramatma), then for who do we sing that atma & paramatma are on & the same?

More Bhakti. Is there any difference between souls? The only difference is their capacity and according to that , their role (s).

4. If Gita sermonizer is not lord Krishna, then how can we claim Shiv as the sermonizer?
Why not? - More Bhakti. Gyan is already in us. We do not learn but we remember .

5. If the purifier of sins is not Ganges, then why is Ganges shown on the forehead of Shankar?
More Bhakti. If the purifier of sins is not "Z" then why "Z" is shown on Shankar?
Is the Ganges anything other than a river?

6. Different religious leaders & spiritual gurus have provided more than 108 versions of Gita, and then according to BK knowledge why is it not possible to explain the Gita?

Because everyone has its own version.

7. If all the scriptures are wrong, then why did Brahma Baba keep saying that even if Brahma comes down to earth, we will not drop the scriptures.

What about "The pinch of salt in a sac full of flour"?

8. If Shankar & Vishnu were not present actually, then why is it that there are so many temples & idols dedicated to both?

Because there is so much Bhakti.... Is Hanuman and Durga and Lakshmi and Ganesh present actually? Really?

kand_72
Posts: 19
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Affinity to the BKWSU: Academic
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: I would like to contribute meaningfully to the discussions.

Re: 8 q's to answer

Post by kand_72 » 16 Sep 2011

Firstly, your answers have no standing as there is no Murli point to support your argument.

Second, you should be aware that whatever is there in Bhakthi is shot here in Gyaan marg, hence all the q's has to have a logical reasoning.

Thirdly, if you say shiv enters the number 1 soul Brahma, then why is it that no 1 calls shiv Brahma, but every 1 says Shiv Shankar, shiv Ram.If Brahma was so important, then why is it there are no temples for Brahma & no1 seems to be worshiping him,except for 1 temple in Pushkar,where as there are 1000's of temple built for Shankar, shiv,Vishnu,Krishna etc.

Do you even know the meaning of Omnipresent & omnipotent,as from what you have mentioned it seems you are quiet new to the knowledge.

As for Ganges, again there is a deeper meaning, than just the physical river.

It would be better if you could revisit all the q's & present Murli points to substantiate your arguments, rather than putting in generic answers,which any body can post just for the heck of posting.

Om Shanti

User avatar
avyakt7
Posts: 53
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Affinity to the BKWSU: BK
Please give a short description of your interest in joining this forum.: Mainly to share Gyan. Understand view points and to enjoy the "process"...
Location: The world
Contact:

Re: 8 q's to answer

Post by avyakt7 » 16 Sep 2011

"Firstly, your answers have no standing as there is no Murli point to support your argument."
"The pinch of salt.." is a Murli point. Don't you remember?
Predestination is another point. Don't you remember?
Brahma being the #1 soul in a Murli point. Don't you remember?
Brahma being Shiva's "Chariot" is a Murli point, Don't you remember?

Your logic is based no in Gyan but in Bhakti. Yesterday's Murli 9/15/11 was about the path of Gyan not being the path of Bhakti. Two different "animals" however, Gyan is the fruit of that Bhakti... but at the same time, Gyan "pure Gyan" is not related whatsoever with Bhakti...

Yes, I know the meaning of omnipresent and omnipotent... like a said before Bhakti terms without Gyani standing.

Where are your Murli points? Because you say " As for Ganges, again there is a deeper meaning, than just the physical river." I don't know of any Murli point which supports that. Do you?

I thought you did not want "unwanted fights and ego clashes"?
Does it make you feel good to belittle my answers just because you don't get them? Do you feel like a "teacher" and want to tell me what to do?
Teach my Gyan, but no Bhakti.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests