sweetchill wrote:* No, I don't think Murlis should be made public
* No, I don't accept that there is some great conspiracy to hide/change the Word of God through revised Murlis (I think it is right and proper that they should be revised).
- • Just out of interest, why don't you think Murlis should be made public?
• What is God's position on all this? Has anybody asked him yet?
I still say the vast majority of this site/forum is objective to BK ... if peppered with a healthy satire ... and it does what Baba's says in the Murli puts all out there for his people to see. (I voted for the second category above). The encyclopedia is straight knowledge, including Murlis, and it is all open to impartial contribution. There are plenty of deep churnings going on and the best you can do is walking in and make hurtful allegations and innuendo.
For me, it is like you have seen one moment's speck of dirt on a white sari and want to humiliate a Draupadi by tearing at it. You want to hurt and offend those for whom this site is a lifeline back to God that the BKWSU will not provide and those the BKWSU's activities have damaged or hurt. Let us see who Krishna protects ... and like a good Pandav, I will gamble everything I have left to bet you won't answer again.
I suppose another interesting question to ask is why no one would come forward to make an official response or statement on behalf of the BKWSU?